Stem Innovation – ‘IZON’ Hard-Coded Credentials

• Exploit Database
• 126 阅读

• 作者： Mark Stanislav
  日期： 2013-10-29
• 类别：

  • webapps
  平台：

  • hardware
• 来源：https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/29266/
• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55

  Stem Innovation ‘IZON’ Hard-coded Credentials (CVE-2013-6236) Mark Stanislav - mstanislav@duosecurity.com     I. DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------- Stem Innovation's IP camera called ‘IZON’ utilizes numerous hard-coded credentials within its Linux distribution and also the hidden web application running on the camera. These sets of credentials are never exposed to the end-user and cannot be changed through any normal operation of the camera. Further, using the web interface credentials will provide access to a camera stream and configuration details, including third-party API keys.     II. TESTED VERSION --------------------------------------- iOS Mobile Application: 1.0.5 Camera Firmware: 2.0.2     III. PoC EXPLOIT --------------------------------------- 1) Telnet Credentials * "root" with a password of "stemroot" * "admin" with a password of "/ADMIN/" * "mg3500" with a password of "merlin"   2) HTTP Credentials (http://camera-ip/mobileye/) * "user" with a password of "user"     IV. SOLUTION --------------------------------------- Update to the latest firmware and hope for the best.     V. REFERENCES --------------------------------------- https://blog.duosecurity.com/2013/10/izon-ip-camera-hardcoded-passwords-and-unencrypted-data-abound/ https://securityledger.com/2013/10/apple-store-favorite-izon-cameras-riddled-with-security-holes/ http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-6236     VI. TIMELINE --------------------------------------- 09/06/2013 - Initial vendor contact stating I wanted to discuss a variety of security issues 09/06/2013 - Vendor’s help desk responded and asked for clarification about my request 09/06/2013 - Responded to the vendor’s help desk and reaffirmed my purpose for contact 09/16/2013 - Updated my existing help desk ticket after not hearing back in 10 days 09/19/2013 - Received a response back to contact their CEO directly about these issues 09/19/2013 - E-mailed the vendor’s CEO with synopsis details and severity ratings for the key issues 09/30/2013 - I opened up a new help desk ticket to follow-up after not hearing from their CEO after 11 days 10/01/2013 - The new case was updated saying that their CEO was aware of my email and would respond 10/03/2013 - I received a follow-up from their CTO with no specific details about plans to fix issues 10/03/2013 - Followed-up with the CTO to ask for specific details about the issues I had found 10/14/2013 - CTO responded asking to “meet” to discuss my findings but again offered no details 10/14/2013 - Offered up time ranges for the next day that were viable to discuss my findings 10/17/2013 - Public presentation of camera research which included these issues 10/28/2013 - Still no response from vendor on confirmation of fixes or a timeline to do so